Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Group Info Group Founded 4 Years ago Statistics 366 Members
19,694 Pageviews314 Watchers

Group Info

The group mainly about American politics so if you have an interest into this you are allowed to submit art about American politics. Occasionally I will create debates by using the blog.

Rules for posting art:
1. It must be yours.
2. The artist must put it to the folder that he/she has political views in.
3. It must be about politics.

Note: There is an issue with uploading art to just ask me if you want to upload art and I will request it for you to accept.

Guidelines for the debates:
1. Bad language is not encouraged. We want to keep this as clean as possible.
2. Try no to hate on other users, example: "You fascist fool! You have no life!" If you have no evidence that he has no life and you keep saying that then you are a hater.
3. Try not to just disagree with something and leave it with that, when typing a comment add details on why you disagree with it. Example: "I disagree with liberals because...."
Group
Founded 4 Years ago
Oct 8, 2011

Location
Global

Group Focus
Social

366 Members
314 Watchers
19,694 Pageviews
Daily Pageviews

Admins

Founder


:icontitanicfan1000:

Co-Founders


:iconblamethe1st::icontaxbane::iconthe-laughing-rabbit::iconkajm::iconsuperawesomechris::icongreatkingrat88::iconshanhikari::iconconservatoons:

Deviants

Newest Members

Visitors

You're not here because you're not logged in
  • :iconorderofthenewworld:
    OrderOfTheNewWorld - Members
    Visited here 14 hours, 38 minutes ago
    Submitted a deviation 6 days ago
  • :icongraeystone:
    Graeystone - Members
    Visited here 18 hours, 52 minutes ago
    Submitted a deviation on March 16th, 2015
  • :iconconstantly-confused:
    constantly-confused
    Visited here 1 day, 20 hours ago
    Isn't a member
  • :icontitanicfan1000:
    Titanicfan1000 - Founder
    Visited here 2 days, 1 hour ago
    Submitted a blog entry 3 days ago
  • :iconbytestream:
    Bytestream - Members
    Visited here 4 days, 4 hours ago
    Voted on August 19th, 2012
  • :iconsuperawesomechris:
    SuperAwesomeChris - Co-Founders
    Visited here 4 days, 14 hours ago
    Voted on November 28th, 2014
  • :iconrmc1618:
    RMC1618 - Members
    Visited here 4 days, 16 hours ago
    Hasn't contributed yet
  • :icondemonichellhound666:
    DemonicHellHound666 - Members
    Visited here 4 days, 19 hours ago
    Voted on April 13th, 2013
  • :iconboshthehedgehog:
    boshthehedgehog - Members
    Visited here 5 days, 7 hours ago
    Submitted a deviation 5 days ago
  • :icongerardogomez:
    GerardoGomez - Members
    Visited here 5 days, 8 hours ago
    Submitted a deviation 6 days ago

Affiliates

:iconda-libertarians::iconomiartists::iconrepublicanwomenunite:
Do not be fooled by the recent lull in the long-running soap opera between U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The U.S. administration has taken a break from the Bibi Wars in order to sell the deal on Iran's nuclear program. It would not be smart policy right now to open up a second front on the peace process, nor to respond critically to every move the new Israeli government makes. Notice the collective yawns of the U.S. administration in response to the appointment of hardliner Silvan Shalom as Netanyahu's new point person on the peace process.  

But trust me on this one: Unless the new Israeli government moderates by morphing into a National Unity coalition (an unlikely prospect for now), this is but a break between rounds. Bibi and Barack, that lovable pair, will be back in the ring before you know it.

I have been bullish on the U.S.-Israeli relationship in large part because I have participated in and watched it for so many years. When it works - when adults are in charge - it can be functional and productive for both sides. It can be, indeed, special. And it has proven remarkably resilient. Unlike Lehman Brothers, the U.S.-Israeli relationship really is too big to fail.

But that doesn't mean some serious fraying is impossible. The relationship is now in a place it has never visited before. The Arab world is melting down; there is pressure to address two of the most critical national security challenges Israel faces - Iran and the Palestinians - at the same time; and you have a narrow, right-wing Israeli government that views reality in a  fundamentally different way than does the Obama administration. Indeed, in the next 20 months, things will remain unsettled and potentially stormy between Washington and its closest ally in the Middle East. Here is why.  

Dysfunction at the Top Won't End

Rarely have I seen a pair of leaders who, for reasons of personal and policy differences, seem so unable to work out a consistent and functional way of cooperating. This duo has bickered longer and more publicly than any previous pair of Israeli and American leaders.

Part of the dysfunction is generational. President Obama was six years old in 1967, when most of the pro-Israeli tropes and narratives surrounding the 1967 War solidified American support for Israel among American Jews and non-Jews alike. Instead, Obama's view of Israel was shaped in the 1980s, when the occupation and Palestinian grievances began to turn the image of Israel as David into the perception of the Jewish State as Goliath. Whether or not the president's perception is also shaped by a civil-rights narrative wherein Israel is perceived as the stronger party, and the Palestinians as the oppressed and disenfranchised underdog, there is a strong sense that the Israelis must be the magnanimous party. Indeed, if you take his words at face value, the president expects more from Israel because he believes it has well-entrenched moral and ethical values. Still, unlike his two predecessors - Bill Clinton and George W. Bush - Obama is much less inclined to give Israel the benefit of the doubt, and he rarely sends any valentines.

The administration wants to make nice for now, particularly with the Jewish community. In the last week, Obama visited one of Washington's oldest synagogues. But the Barack-Bibi imbroglio is not likely to end. Too many public rows between the two have eroded confidence and entrenched negative images. In the president's mind, the prime minister is a con man. Regardless of what he says, Obama believes Netanyahu is neither serious about respecting U.S. interests on Iran and the peace process, nor is he interested in real give-and-take. In the prime minister's view, the president has a bloodless view of Israel's security predicament and is eager to see Netanyahu replaced by someone more flexible.

Iran/Iran/Iran

The Iranian nuclear issue has come to illustrate the great divide between the two. Indeed, it is a source of tension that will continue to ensure personal and policy upsets. For Netanyahu, a deal with Iran will sow more disorder into an already chaotic region, and it will threaten Israel. For Obama, a deal brings order, not disorder - it creates a framework to avoid war and press Tehran to cooperate on a variety of other regional crises such as those in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. What drives Netanyahu to distraction is not just what he regards as the president's naïveté. It is that his own success as prime minister is bound up with leading Israel out of the dark shadow of the Iranian bomb, yet a U.S.-Iranian agreement leaves him powerless to do much in that direction.

Interceding in U.S. politics through House Speaker John Boehner may have boosted Netanyahu's image as a leader who stands up for Israel, but it was also costly. The act frayed the bipartisan character of the U.S.-Israeli bond, and Netanyahu has proved unable (as of yet) to stop the deal. And unless the final deal is a fire sale of bargain-basement giveaways to the mullahs, Congress will likely not want the responsibility of blocking it.

Diverging Interests

Relations between allies do not rest on individuals alone, but on interests as well. And while Iran represents a major divide, so does the pursuit of Israeli-Palestinian peace. Set aside the fact that the positions of Netanyahu do not align with those of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on issues such as borders, refugees, or Jerusalem. Part of what is driving this dysfunctional duo is that Washington and Jerusalem themselves are not on the same page. In past peace processes, the driving dynamic saw the United States and Israel coordinate somewhat - with Washington pushing Israel to offer more - around positions that might then be sold to the Arabs. That is not possible now. Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry have apparently discussed some moves on borders and other issues - moves that had real potential. But these conversations remain fruitless. And it is hard to imagine, with this new Israeli government, that the prime minister has the interest and/or the capacity to push the peace issue - not when the U.S. administration is going its own way on Iran, and the Palestinians are going their own way in seeking recognition for statehood in the international community.

Aaron David Miller, a Vice President at the Woodrow Wilson Center, served as a Middle East negotiator, analyst and adviser in Republican and Democratic Administrations.

Read more here: www.realclearworld.com/article…
More Journal Entries

Recent Journal Entries

Monthly Stats

Group Activity

Favourites

Gallery Folders

Featured
Art for Libertarians

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Feb 16, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
I forget: is there any rule about blocking people from commenting? 'americandreamer' blocked me on my very first comment on any of his works. When I saw his piece today I almost voted it down, just for that reason.
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Jan 23, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Oh do I Hate that! I went to click 'NO' and hit 'yes.' *sigh* he's quite right to use 'pinhead' in his handle.
Reply
:iconphoenix-galaxy1010:
Phoenix-Galaxy1010 Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2015
Thank you for the request, I'm honored.^^
Reply
:iconzucca-xerfantes:
Zucca-Xerfantes Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
I don't know if you folks know, but :iconorderofthenewworld: is censoring people who disagree with him rather than permitting civil debate. I did not attack him personally, I did not use profanity and I did not insult.

I asked him to cite his sources, so he censored me, blocking me.
Reply
:icongerszewski:
Gerszewski Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2015
I spoke with him, too. He's not capable of argumentation, he's just spreading his own ideas like universal truth.
Reply
:iconzucca-xerfantes:
Zucca-Xerfantes Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
I wouldn't mind if he wasn't censoring opposing viewpoints.

Hell, I wasn't even opposing, just saying 'Produce some evidence', to which he refused. When I told him that nobody would believe him and he'd look like non-credible without evidence, he blocked me.
Reply
:iconkasaundra1:
kasaundra1 Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks for letting me join the group!
Reply
:icontitanicfan1000:
Titanicfan1000 Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2014  Student Writer
no prob
Reply
:iconkasaundra1:
kasaundra1 Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thanks!
Reply
:iconslr1238:
slr1238 Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2014
Thanks for letting me join the group.
Reply
Add a Comment: